How task instructions affect performance on the unspecified tetrad test

John Castura/ June 15, 2018/ Peer-reviewed Paper/ 0 comments

This parallel‐groups study (n = 1,857) investigates compliance of untrained assessors with tetrad instructions. Stimuli are four unique color swatches that differ only in their green chromaticities. Results confirm that the swatches used in this study were generally perceived as nonconfusable visual stimuli ordered A, B, C, D, and that AB and CD were more different than BC. These stimuli thus modeled the scenario in which following the tetrad decision strategy (grouping samples into two groups of two by similarity) gives a correct response, whereas following the select‐two decision strategy (selecting the two most similar samples) gives an incorrect response.

Four of the five variants of tetrad task instructions, including the tetrad instructions that are usually recommended, were understood by roughly 90–95% of the assessors. Neither perceptual variance nor guessing provided adequate explanations for the incorrect groupings observed. Results indicate that the optimal cognitive decision strategy is not always followed because some assessors misinterpret instructions systematically. Results imply that d′ estimates from the conventional tetrad test method with untrained assessors may slightly underestimate δ. As a safeguard, it is suggested that any written task instructions be supplemented with verbal instructions and/or visual demonstrations, with the aim of increasing task understanding.

Castura, J. C., King, S. K., & Phipps, K. (2018). How task instructions affect performance on the unspecified tetrad test. Journal of Sensory Studies, e12329.

Share this Post

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *